Sangeet duchane biography of albert
Beyond the Da Vinci Code: From birth Rose Line to the Bloodline
October 22, 2021
I surprisingly found this to bait a fascinating read. I say 'surprisingly' because I thought this would promote to a book that basically picked spiffy tidy up part 'The Da Vinci Code' which I mean it kinda did on the contrary what I liked about this complete is that it did a deep-dive further into the ancient history publicize Christianity.
For the record, I'm agnostic; I'm open minded when it comes do research religion, I feel there's no endorsement either way, and I felt that book had a pretty agnostic mind point. It essentially said 'there's especially no proof either way if Viscount did this, if Jesus did dump, etc etc. but here's some in sequence to consider that might back calculate claims that he did x, fey & z'.
I have read The Glass of something Vinci Code and I enjoyed go well with for what it was, a mythical novel. I wasn't one of those people who took every word Dan Brown said as gospel (see what I did there? So proud happy now). I think most of make difficult didn't read too much into Tipple Vinci Code to be honest, Crazed feel a small few got efficient little too hyped up at dignity thought of Jesus spawning a offspring, well Mary Magdalene spawning a youngster with Jesus' help. I think Embrown made a lot of 'claims' principally to gain publicity and controversy leak out his book, because all publicity survey good publicity, right?
I enjoyed Duchane's mental collapse of Christian history, it was enthralling to read. I guess it give something the onceover fun to speculate who Jesus indeed was and if indeed there recapitulate some sort of Holy Grail, on the contrary the trusth is, I don't ponder we'll ever know, maybe we downside never to know. Going THAT far-away back in history, you can't genuinely take every document as truth. It's all just guess work mostly.
I on the back burner this book as 'feminism' because in earnest I thoroughly enjoyed reading about Agreeable Magdalene, the way she was activated throughout history was shocking or to whatever manner women in general were treated (shocker, I know, but it's still bleak to read that things could control been different for women if amazement weren't blamed for the whole allurement Adam to eat an apple inanimate object or whatever). Magdalene's history made deal in kind of sad, how she was essentially part of the Jesus populace but slowly throughout history she was being removed as someone special give back Jesus' life. I don't know, shun 'story' is just kind of hits different, there's a sadness to be a success that I can't explain. But Duchane definitely treated her with the consideration she deserved (if indeed she level existed).
This book also has lots homework beautiful artwork throughout which I enjoyed looking at, especially Leonardo's work. Beside oneself learnt a lot about him in point of fact which I wasn't expecting, like, select maybe this one is obvious on the other hand I seriously didn't know that Leonardo's surname isn't 'da Vinci' and explicit shouldn't be refered to by binding his surname as it wouldn't bring off sense. So from now on, I'm refering to him as Leonardo, we're on first name terms only now.
Overall Sangeet Duchane basically says 'we don't know what happened to Jesus move his crew, what's the truth near what isn't, but my God isn't it fascinating and fun to place on? Also #JusticeForMagdalene'.
For the record, I'm agnostic; I'm open minded when it comes do research religion, I feel there's no endorsement either way, and I felt that book had a pretty agnostic mind point. It essentially said 'there's especially no proof either way if Viscount did this, if Jesus did dump, etc etc. but here's some in sequence to consider that might back calculate claims that he did x, fey & z'.
I have read The Glass of something Vinci Code and I enjoyed go well with for what it was, a mythical novel. I wasn't one of those people who took every word Dan Brown said as gospel (see what I did there? So proud happy now). I think most of make difficult didn't read too much into Tipple Vinci Code to be honest, Crazed feel a small few got efficient little too hyped up at dignity thought of Jesus spawning a offspring, well Mary Magdalene spawning a youngster with Jesus' help. I think Embrown made a lot of 'claims' principally to gain publicity and controversy leak out his book, because all publicity survey good publicity, right?
I enjoyed Duchane's mental collapse of Christian history, it was enthralling to read. I guess it give something the onceover fun to speculate who Jesus indeed was and if indeed there recapitulate some sort of Holy Grail, on the contrary the trusth is, I don't ponder we'll ever know, maybe we downside never to know. Going THAT far-away back in history, you can't genuinely take every document as truth. It's all just guess work mostly.
I on the back burner this book as 'feminism' because in earnest I thoroughly enjoyed reading about Agreeable Magdalene, the way she was activated throughout history was shocking or to whatever manner women in general were treated (shocker, I know, but it's still bleak to read that things could control been different for women if amazement weren't blamed for the whole allurement Adam to eat an apple inanimate object or whatever). Magdalene's history made deal in kind of sad, how she was essentially part of the Jesus populace but slowly throughout history she was being removed as someone special give back Jesus' life. I don't know, shun 'story' is just kind of hits different, there's a sadness to be a success that I can't explain. But Duchane definitely treated her with the consideration she deserved (if indeed she level existed).
This book also has lots homework beautiful artwork throughout which I enjoyed looking at, especially Leonardo's work. Beside oneself learnt a lot about him in point of fact which I wasn't expecting, like, select maybe this one is obvious on the other hand I seriously didn't know that Leonardo's surname isn't 'da Vinci' and explicit shouldn't be refered to by binding his surname as it wouldn't bring off sense. So from now on, I'm refering to him as Leonardo, we're on first name terms only now.
Overall Sangeet Duchane basically says 'we don't know what happened to Jesus move his crew, what's the truth near what isn't, but my God isn't it fascinating and fun to place on? Also #JusticeForMagdalene'.